Ethereum: Can I modify the source code of Bitcoin to generate addresses people have already used?

Can you modify Bitcoin’s source code to generate addresses that people have already used?

When it comes to managing Bitcoin addresses, one of the most pressing concerns is to generate exclusive addresses for each transaction. A common approach is to use a technique called “address hash” or “random address generation”. This method involves using an encrypted pseudorandom numbers generator (CSPRNG) to create new random addresses whenever a new one is needed.

Current Bitcoin Implementation

In Bitcoin, the bitcoin-qt.exe program source, used to run the Bitcoin customer on Windows, generates new random addresses every time it starts. This is done using a CSPRNG for hash the seed value and create an exclusive address string based on this hash.

Modifying the code -source

Now, let’s explore if you can modify Bitcoin’s source code to generate addresses that people have already used. Although technically possible, there are several reasons why this is unlikely to be an effective solution:

  • Cryptographic security : The purpose of using a CSPRNG for address generation is to create truly random and unpredictable addresses. If someone modifies the code -source, they could exploit vulnerabilities in the system or introduce backdoors that would allow them to generate known addresses by existing users.

  • Hash collisions: Even with a CSPRNG, hash collisions (or collisions) can occur when two different inputs produce the same output hash. This means that if someone changes source code and compile a new version of bitcoin-qt.exe, they could use an address that has already been used by another user.

  • Histh History : Bitcoin uses a “Hash History” table, which follows all known addresses in Blockchain. If you have changed the code -source to generate new addresses, someone with knowledge of this hash history would be able to predict and avoid using these addresses.

Why new addresses are still needed

Although the modification of the code -source may seem a viable solution, it is not practical or safe for many reasons:

  • Security : As mentioned earlier, exploring system vulnerabilities or introducing backdoors is still a risk.

  • Hash collisions: Even if you could predict new addresses, there would still be a hash collisions, allowing someone to use an address already used by another user.

  • Network Safety : If multiple nodes on the network have different addresses, compromising a knot’s confidence can lead to a denial of service (DOS) or even a blockchain acquisition.

Conclusion

In conclusion, modifying the Bitcoin source code to generate addresses that people have already used is not a viable or safe solution. The risk of cryptographic safety and hash collision make this approach unacceptable. Instead, the best practice to manage Bitcoin addresses is to use an exclusive address format that guarantees randomness and unpredictability, such as the standard bitcoin address format (m/0/0/c) generated by bitcoin-qt. exe.

METAMASK DISCONNECT WITH ETHERS

Comments

mood_bad
  • No comments yet.
  • Add a comment